I have no problem with two people working out a mutually-voluntary agreement so they can both use real estate they both own- like a time share arrangement.
But this "joint land use" topic that keeps coming up is no different than me driving out to some place I think looks like a useful area (useful to me) and telling the property owners that we are going to work out an arrangement wherein I will shoot my deer rifle across their land and over their homes, and they must accommodate me. They will not be allowed to interfere nor build anything new that sticks up that I might hit. Maybe I'll even get an airplane and buzz their property. What's the difference?
This is just another bit of proof that the US military is a force for evil, not a protector of liberty.