What is your opinion of Edward Snowden "breaking his oath" and spilling the beans about the NSA spying on you?
My opinion: an oath made to a criminal thug (one who violates life, liberty, pursuit of happiness) or a gang of criminal thugs can't be in any way binding. Especially when they don't keep their oaths.
If you swore an oath in good faith, but you later discover that the guys you had sworn your oath to had broken their oaths and were requiring you to do the same, under the guise of keeping your oath to them, you are released from any obligation.
To me, an oath made to someone who breaks their part of the oath first is null and void. You may choose to keep your end of the bargain even after they have broken it on their end, but you are not obligated to do so.
As soon as Edward Snowden discovered that those he was working for/with were oathbreakers of the most dangerous kind, he was released from any obligation his oath may have created.
Confused military tools to the contrary.
In my opinion.
- KentForLiberty- Home
- Zero Aggression
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Counterfeit "laws"
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Privacy & ID
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- My Job Search
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent