I believe it is, but maybe not the way the term is often used.
I see "society" as a useful term for describing a large system made up of many interacting, individual parts. An emergent property.
Sort of the way "weather" is. Or "The market".
If a raindrop hits you, you might not say it is "raining" if that was the only drop. And, even if it is raining, not every potential rain drop will fall.
A "society" isn't guilty just because one individual is guilty. If "everyone" is guilty, you can still find individuals who are not.
It's why I still use the word "society" in some contexts. It doesn't replace individuals, but it can describe the general weather. The "system" that results from the actions of each individual part.
- KentForLiberty- Home
- Zero Aggression
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Counterfeit "laws"
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Privacy & ID
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- My Job Search
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent