One thing that bothers me is that, in their zeal to protect minorities from violation by the majority (or, more often, from the minority with political power), some people protect archators.
This is terribly misguided.
If someone archates, they need to face the natural consequences. Otherwise, they'll never learn better. It doesn't matter why they archate.
If you archate for "social justice" or any other reason you are just as wrong as someone who archates because he wants your property or your body.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are perhaps better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Articles
- Links
- My Job Search
- Activism
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent

Sunday, November 27, 2016
Not all "minorities" are innocent
Labels:
advice,
Demopublicans,
future,
liberty,
personal,
Property Rights,
responsibility,
society
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment