Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Blame not the tyrant, blame the people who obey him

I haven't got a clue what anti-liberty "executive orders" Obama has proclaimed concerning guns.  I'm sure I will find out what most of them are in the coming days.  However, I could not possibly care less what he thinks will become "law" just because he declares it so.

Real law is discovered, not created by rulers.

Real law, also called Natural Law, says you have the right to own anything you want, as long as you didn't get it through theft, fraud, force, or threat of force.  Anything.  Any weapon at all.  Yes, even nuclear bombs.

The possession of anything can never be a violation of any real law.  Only initiation of force (or a credible threat to initiate force) and theft violate real law.  If you hurt someone or damage their property it doesn't matter what you use to hurt them- YOU are the guilty one, not your tool.  Anyone who believes otherwise is a superstitious idiot.  Yes, Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, and probably just about everyone else who works for the government in some capacity- I am speaking to you.

Obama is violating real law- Natural Law- by pretending he can take your property and/or liberty.  By violating your fundamental liberty to own anything you wish, and to defend your life, liberty, and property in any way you see fit with any tool you wish to use, he has declared war on you.  Just as Bush the Decider did before him by imposing the Patriot Act.  They are no different than a mugger in a dark alley demanding "Your money or your life".

Only people who plan on obeying Obama's anti-liberty proclamations worry about what they might be.  I don't worry about it.  I know he is the sworn enemy of liberty, and as such he has declared that he is my mortal enemy.  This is not news to me.

I will not obey.  Not one more inch.

Molon Labe!



  1. Hawk:

    They are no different than a mugger in a dark alley demanding "Your money or your life".

    The advantage you've got with the mugger is this: The mugger knows s/he's a mugger.


  2. Another advantage, defending yourself against a mugger is "legal".

    Not so the uniformed thugs.

  3. Tell the NYPD or the Chicago Badged Mafia that defending yourself from a mugger is "legal" and see how far that gets you. ;)
    Shoot, shovel, and shut up. Or, in an "urban" environment, "Shoot, shuffle off, and shut up".

  4. I wish I had your abilities as a thinker and then as a wordsmith. Making a tho't clear is most important to any communication between humans, even if it is unpleasant to the recipient. If you or I can make our position understandable then an "opponent" can make a fair counter-argument. If any point is mixed up with emotional clauses, if starts being coercive, even if the concept is valid. Example. "You must not kill people, because god loves everyone and killing people hurts god." Actually killing people hurts the people who got killed and their friends and relatives, the rest is intended as emotional propaganda. - P.Bru

  5. Kent, I meant out in the rest of real America, not the inner-city Socialist war zones.

  6. Curt- Do muggers exist outside those inner-city Socialist war zones?
    I had a friend get mugged once, but it was in a big (Southern) city, and he didn't defend himself; he just got "dutifully" shot.